Archived — below our codifiability bar

Robot de Trading, Gestión de Escalado

Discover an automated trading robot designed for funding evaluations, featuring advanced scaling management to help you pass prop firm challenges efficiently.

Published · Archived · Methodology: Mixed

  • Algo score: 70%
  • Discretionary score: 50%

This strategy was decoded from a public trading video but did not clear Strategy Decoder's codifiability bar: the extraction could not pin the rules down precisely enough to be turned into a reviewable specification. It is kept here as a reference post-mortem rather than as a strategy you can trade or backtest.

  • Methodology: Mixed
  • Content type: both

Why this strategy was archived

Scaling management is the practice of adjusting position size as an account moves through the phases of a funded-account evaluation, where a profit target and a fixed drawdown limit constrain how much exposure a trader can carry at any point. Hobbiecode's video "NEW: Robot de Trading para Evaluaciones de Fondeo (Gestión de Escalado)" presents an automated approach built around that problem — a robot framed specifically for prop-firm evaluations rather than for open-ended discretionary trading.

**Why this entry is archived.** Our extraction scored this video below the codifiability bar. The content is descriptive rather than prescriptive: scaling is discussed as a management concept, but the pieces an automated system needs are never pinned down — no objective criteria for when size is increased or reduced, no confirmation trigger, and no stop or target logic. Our extractor also recovered no named indicators, timeframes, or markets to anchor the logic to. What remains cannot be coded or backtested faithfully without filling the gaps with guesswork, and an entry that requires guesswork does not belong in the active catalog.

**What it still offers.** The framing is genuinely useful: it puts the evaluation's own constraints — the drawdown ceiling, the phase structure, the target — at the center of the sizing decision, which is the part most retail strategy content ignores in favor of entry signals. If you are working on funded-account evaluations, treat this as orientation on how automation gets applied to that specific problem, and see the risk and position-sizing concept hubs, or the active catalog, for entries where a complete rule set was successfully extracted.

Source video

Decoded from: NEW: Robot de Trading para Evaluaciones de Fondeo (Gestión de Escalado) by Hobbiecode — watch the original

Frequently asked questions

Why is this scaling management entry archived?

The video presents scaling for funded-account evaluations as a concept but defines no objective sizing criteria, confirmation trigger, or stop and target logic. Our extraction scored it below the codifiability bar we require for the active catalog.

What is scaling management in a funding evaluation?

It is the practice of adjusting position size as an account progresses through a prop-firm evaluation, balancing the profit target against a fixed drawdown limit so that exposure grows or shrinks with the room left in the account.

Is the video still worth watching?

Yes — as orientation. It frames sizing around the evaluation's own constraints rather than around the entry signal, which is a perspective most strategy content skips.

Where can I find codifiable risk and position-sizing strategies?

The active catalog and the risk-management and position-sizing concept hubs list decoded video strategies with fully extracted entry, exit, and sizing rules.

Other archived strategies

Browse all archived strategies · Explore the strategies that did make the cut